Retirement

[S Landreth]

rehashing drip #4

Slow drip #4

A sad losers employment history.

The Facts

17. The Claimant applied for the Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx posts. He named three referees on his application form, Xxxxx Xxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxx (five months employment in 2018, most recent employer), Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx – Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (seven months employment in 2016-17) and Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx (four months employment in 2016).

20………. told the Tribunal that she considered that the application which she now knows to be the Claimant’s, p XXX – XXX, was strong, ………….. His experience of working with a wide range of funders, and the fact that he had worked abroad, suggested that he could work well with different people.

51. The Claimant told her that he wished to start as soon as possible and, on the same day,……

55. On 19 June 2019, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant’s 3 referees, asking for a reference…..

85. Xx Xxxxx was cross examined………. “I look for references which confirm what the candidate has said in their application and interview. If a reference does not confirm the strengths and qualities of candidate then it is not satisfactory. I have never had an instance like this before where I have not had at least one strong reference for an individual.”

89. Xx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant on 24 June 2019 saying that: "l regret to inform you that due to receipt of unsatisfactory references, we will not be proceeding with the appointment, and are withdrawing our offer of employment'.

Little math.

2016 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 4 of those months
2016/17 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 7 months
2018 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 5 months
2019 – 6 months looking for work but not working

So,…………out of 42 months the unemployable loser worked 16 months in 3 different jobs. (38% of the time working during 3.5 years)

The loser has no long-term employment history. It is an embarrassment to society which it does not contribute to.

Why?

Never wanted that drab existence, and never needed it....

3 different jobs in 3.5 years working only 16 months and it “never wanted that drab existence”.

The unemployable loser couldn’t find a steady job

[Mr Tinkles]

Sleep time now now though Tiny. You need to be up at 4:45am to pump that precious iron then do your miserable factory shite all over again

This miserable life couldn't have happened to a nicer person. Karma

[S Landreth]

Serrollt & Ms. Tinkles

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

This miserable life couldn't have happened to a nicer person. Karma

True:

2016 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 4 of those months
2016/17 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 7 months
2018 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 5 months
2019 – 6 months looking for work but not working

So,…………out of 42 months the unemployable loser worked 16 months in 3 different jobs. (38% of the time working during 3.5 years)

The loser has no long-term employment history. It is an embarrassment to society which it does not contribute to.

[Arthur Daley]

This miserable life couldn't have happened to a nicer person. Karma

But I feel a bit guilty for not posting on his oddball "I've handed in my resignation" thread in 2008.

Someone should have pointed out to the common sense lacking tool that he was being stitched up by the factory wanting to recruit him in the same way he bought a house for someone and became their early retirement fund whilst feeling "smug, self satisfied and very very lucky" for not getting hitched to a prostitute and for getting a bargain basement dowry price.

The factory job was only ever going to be the career equivalent of supervising moron shelf stackers back in the west, hence him posting that he was "miserable and disillusioned" about it on MyFitnessPal, having figured out he'd been duped and trapped. And here he is ^ trying to feel better about it by sneering at someone that worked part time and part year before retiring in their 40s.

Should have joined the NZ navy when you had the chance, eh?

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

If office temp had clocked-in as regularly for his work as he does his raaaaaaaaaaging and lying on forums he might've passed probation.

[Arthur Daley]

Someone's going to be apocalyptic when the "facts" they're desperately clinging to evaporate!


Hey tiny, if you ask nicely perhaps the PaknSave branch you end up in will give you a "Director of Shelf Stacking Drones" job title so you can continue with your haughty delusions when you repatriate and start earning that state pension

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

It's so ridiculous: rant; raaaaaaaaaaage; and lie...

Rinse & repeat ad infinitum

It's ranting and/or raaaaaaaaging and/or lying again, isn't it.

[S Landreth]

it is

Arthur Daley……… Someone's going to be apocalyptic when the "facts" they're desperately clinging to evaporate!

smeg/Arthur Daley/nitcha is a liar and The Facts support it

The Facts

79………..lt did not support what the Claimant had written on his application form or said in his interview, nor did it confirm his suitability

[Arthur Daley]

Be sure to keep that chavvy tattoo concealed at the branch interview though, or it might end up in demotion from supervisor to drone

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

it is

Arthur Daley……… Someone's going to be apocalyptic when the "facts" they're desperately clinging to evaporate!

More of its hollow and empty threats.

It's always 'wait until...', 'someone's going to be...', 'I'm going to turn up...' with this raaaaaaaaging and lying clown.

And actual follow-throughs = 0. Meanwhile its lies remain.

[Arthur Daley]

Threats? Do you want me to get a lawyer to threaten you with arrest or something?

Anyway, best you hire a car too. If you turn up in the PaknSave branch carpark in the chestwig chariot Pacer with the dependants asleep in the back while they wait for social housing, you've no chance of employment

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

Question is whose benefit is it actually lying and issuing it's hollow threats for?

Bitch Tinkles is dumb enough to believe anything it says, Smegbie and the Nazi Oompa Loompa--whilst obviously no geniuses themselves either--are both bitter and desperate enough to repeat what it says even if they don't believe it, and the objective facts are already there to show any rational person that it's a bald-faced and delusional liar.

So is it trying to convince itself? Is it that deluded that it thinks it can just lie things away?

Because meanwhile...

The Facts

79………..lt did not support what the Claimant had written on his application form or said in his interview, nor did it confirm his suitability

...'retired in my 40s...'

[S Landreth]

Rehashing the employment history of a fat loser

Slow drip #4

A sad losers employment history.

The Facts

17. The Claimant applied for the Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx posts. He named three referees on his application form, Xxxxx Xxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxx (five months employment in 2018, most recent employer), Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx – Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (seven months employment in 2016-17) and Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx (four months employment in 2016).

20………. told the Tribunal that she considered that the application which she now knows to be the Claimant’s, p XXX – XXX, was strong, ………….. His experience of working with a wide range of funders, and the fact that he had worked abroad, suggested that he could work well with different people.

51. The Claimant told her that he wished to start as soon as possible and, on the same day,……

55. On 19 June 2019, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant’s 3 referees, asking for a reference…..

85. Xx Xxxxx was cross examined………. “I look for references which confirm what the candidate has said in their application and interview. If a reference does not confirm the strengths and qualities of candidate then it is not satisfactory. I have never had an instance like this before where I have not had at least one strong reference for an individual.”

89. Xx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant on 24 June 2019 saying that: "l regret to inform you that due to receipt of unsatisfactory references, we will not be proceeding with the appointment, and are withdrawing our offer of employment'.

Little math.

2016 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 4 of those months
2016/17 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 7 months
2018 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 5 months
2019 – 6 months looking for work but not working

So,…………out of 42 months the unemployable loser worked 16 months in 3 different jobs. (38% of the time working during 3.5 years)

The loser has no long-term employment history. It is an embarrassment to society which it does not contribute to.

Why?

Never wanted that drab existence, and never needed it....

3 different jobs in 3.5 years working only 16 months and it “never wanted that drab existence”.

The unemployable loser couldn’t find a steady job

Arthur Daley……… Someone's going to be apocalyptic when the "facts" they're desperately clinging to evaporate!

[S Landreth]

Rehashing just a small section of slow drip #3

Slow drip #3

worthwhile holidays Smeg/Arthur Daley/Nitcha never goes on and the reason why.

Smeg/Arthur Daley/Nitcha never goes on any worthwhile holidays or will spend “the next year or two of retirement in” because it has never held a long-term job and it’s cheap (“money sweetspots., 25% cheaper, it's cheaper”).

Can anyone show me a handful of threads started by Smeg/Arthur Daley/Nitcha on a worthwhile holiday (with pictures not taken from the net) on any of the three forums we know the unemployable loser will post/posted on?