Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Evolution: No Straight Line

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Evolution: No Straight Line

    Evolution: that famous 'march of progress' image is just wrong

    Jordi Paps, Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, University of Bristol and Cristina Guijarro-Clarke, PhD Candidate in Evolution, University of Essex
    The ConversationMarch 2, 2020, 10:13 PM GMT+7

    1fd636680e61c6c3059413d790eec148.jpg

    Usagi-P/Shutterstock

    Evolution explains how all living beings, including us, came to be. It would be easy to assume evolution works by continuously adding features to organisms, constantly increasing their complexity. Some fish evolved legs and walked onto the land. Some dinosaurs evolved wings and began to fly. Others evolved wombs and began to give birth to live young.

    Yet this is one of the most predominant and frustrating misconceptions about evolution. Many successful branches of the tree of life have stayed simple, such as bacteria, or have reduced their complexity, such as parasites. And they are doing very well.

    In a recent studythe march of progressFull House (1996), Gould uses the model of the drunkard walk. A drunkard leaves a bar in a train station and clumsily walks back and forth over the platform, swinging between the bar and the train tracks. Given enough time, the drunkard will fall in the tracks and will get stuck there.

    The platform represents a scale of complexity, the pub being the lowest complexity and the tracks the maximum. Life emerged by coming out of the pub, with the minimum complexity possible. Sometimes it randomly stumbles towards the tracks (evolving in a way that increases complexity) and other times towards the pub (reducing complexity).

    No option is better than the other. Staying simple or reducing complexity may be better for survival than evolving with increased complexity, depending on the environment.

    But in some cases, groups of animals evolve complex features that are intrinsic to the way their bodies work, and can no longer lose those genes to become simpler - they become stuck in the train tracks. (There are no trains to worry about in this metaphor.) For example, multicellular organisms rarely go back to become unicellular.

    If we only focus on the organisms trapped in the train tracks, then we have a biased perception of life evolving in a straight line from simple to complex, mistakenly believing that older lifeforms are always simple and newer ones are complex. But the real path to complexity is more tortuous.

    ...more here: https://www.yahoo.com/news/evolution...151329373.html
    Last edited by harrymsmarkle; 03-03-2020, 06:28 AM.
    Majestically enthroned amid the vulgar herd

  • #2
    Old conventional line.



    Firstly, we didn't evolve from simians - not even a distant relative.

    Secondly, as a life form our development jumped much to fast as nature would have it. The BIG missing link [sort to speak]

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Somchai Boonporn View Post
      Old conventional line.



      Firstly, we didn't evolve from simians - not even a distant relative.

      Secondly, as a life form our development jumped much to fast as nature would have it. The BIG missing link [sort to speak]
      ...few (except tRumptards) believe we're descended from simians... we have the same the same ancestor, however...
      Majestically enthroned amid the vulgar herd

      Comment


      • #4
        ET has a mark in our supposed development.

        Comment

        Valentina Jewels gets pounded like a btich dog ?????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ???? diferentes tipos de bajinas
        antalya escort bayan
        Working...
        X