Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DirtyDog and who he didn't have time for.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    The prat contradicts himself with his haughty "I'm not dishing out commands. But when I "call" your comments, I expect you to prove them, or withdraw them" foot-stamping.

    Originally posted by TheRealKW View Post

    Obey my command? You really are completely nuts.

    If you make a claim the burden of proof is on the person making the claim. or withdraw the claim.

    Comment


    • #77


      Originally posted by Arthur Daley View Post
      It said he'd met KW and he was a nasty cnut. Pretty much those exact words.


      Originally posted by ShaunSheep View Post
      As I mentioned, I can't remember the exact words, but I can definitely confirm that they were depreciative of KW....

      Originally posted by Arthur Daley View Post
      LD, would you mind doing the honours and screenshotting the deceased saying he had met KW and he was a nasty cnut? Presumably the thread is in the members room.

      Then let's laugh at KW trying to disprove it.
      Originally posted by ShaunSheep View Post
      Okey dokey....here we go.

      On page 9 of Wally's thread, here https://teakdoor.com/members-only/19...ver-had-9.html


      KW said in response to Looper's post " Hey don't ruin this love story"

      Wally replied :
      ^ nasty fvcker KW. seriously. i met you many years ago. kick me when i am down. well done. go fvck yourself.

      Which is obviously very different from “he'd met KW and he was a nasty cnut.”


      Which also explains your reluctance and the faux outrage at being asked to prove it. Unfortunately for you, LD is a little bit challenged, and a bit simple in the head and thinks that these quotes mean the thing.


      Last edited by TheRealKW; 10-12-2020, 02:01 PM.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by TheRealKW View Post
        faux outrage at being asked to prove it


        Gets laughed at for making outraged foot-stamping demands for people to prove their comments or retract them, then projects his outrage onto them when he fails to get his way.

        Pure narcissism.

        You can ask your mate ImTiny for his lawyer contact details to get a cease or desist letter fired off next time you're outraged by my comments about you

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by TheRealKW View Post




          Unfortunately for you, LD is a little bit challenged, and a bit simple in the head and thinks that these quotes mean the thing.
          No, I admitted I was unclear about what was said, which is why I said in my first post about the matter :

          Originally posted by ShaunSheep View Post
          As I recall, Wally Dorian Raffles said something along the lines of "I met Willy and he did seem rather odd". Is that thread still around ? We could look...
          And then after that :

          Originally posted by ShaunSheep View Post

          As I mentioned, I can't remember the exact words, but I can definitely confirm that they were depreciative of KW....
          And by the way, KW :.... go fvck yourself.


          :
          Last edited by ShaunSheep; 10-12-2020, 04:01 PM.

          Comment


          • #80
            Only a prat who is

            Originally posted by TheRealKW View Post
            a little bit challenged
            and who really hates being shown up as a prat, would try to beat his chest in victory by claiming:

            Originally posted by TheRealKW View Post
            He didn't say he'd met me and I'm a nasty cnut, you liar! He said that I'm a nasty fcuker, seriously, and that he met me many years ago.

            Comment


            • #81
              Foot stamping demands? Outrage?

              Hardly fellas.

              Arthur Daley View Post
              Pretty much those exact words.


              *snigger*

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by TheRealKW View Post
                *snigger*
                Aw bless. Don't worry, it'll heal soon

                why%20dogs%20lick%20their%20wounds.jpg

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Arthur Daley View Post
                  "burden of proof"



                  So, in every debate, every time a participant makes a comment, they have a "burden of proof" to produce evidence and back it up, or retract it?
                  Obviously not, why don't you simply admit that your recollection of the comment was erronous, disingenuous prat.

                  Ok, stop the thread. I'm going to go back over all of your posts, repost everything, and you either have to produce evidence to back it up or retract it and apologise. And then I'm going to do it on every other thread. And you have to comply, or you're "very transparently coping out" and are a proven liar. ok?

                  Firstly.
                  Prove that I have dozens of TD nics. Put up or shut up. And don't take long about it, because I have a lot more things for you to prove or retract next. No yawning. I don't care if it's boring. These are your rules, not mine.
                  Getting all hot under the collar, are we now?
                  I haven't set out your imaginary rules. Obviously there is a difference between being wrong and being a liar, there's also a difference between claims, which may or may not require proof when questioned. Yes, denigrating someone's character by referring to the written word of a third person is an occasion where proof should and can easily be provided.
                  Also, first you state -like a petulant teen- that you don't need to back anything up that you claim, now you're demanding the exact opposite from me, even for an obviously overstated snide remark.
                  Are you denying that you have had a succession of nics on TD, have you lost count? Most banned, jailed or miserabled?

                  Dont get sick of me just yet, for I will be here for quite a while

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Arthur Daley View Post
                    KW has proved himself to be such on many occasions, including via his long-term oddball obsession with "calling" forum members on things they post, to try to role-play being a judge tasked with proof-burdening and belittling them, scoring petty oneupmanship, and consequently feeling better about his sad sack self.
                    Dirtydog had to usher KW out of the newbies section on a leash, for doing just that.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      I remember that....pretty inappropriate. But just another example of how KW is deranged.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by socal View Post

                        Dirtydog had to usher KW out of the newbies section on a leash, for doing just that.
                        And you had to be ushered off the forum for being an utter fokwit and adolescent prick. Then came back and couldn't even separate your socks and got done for multinicking - what a dumbo!

                        Dont get sick of me just yet, for I will be here for quite a while

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by serrollt View Post
                          Obviously not, why don't you simply admit that your recollection of the comment was erronous, disingenuous prat.
                          Why don't you simply admit that you're white-knighting for a long lost boyfriend, and that nobody but you and he are obsessing about the difference between a "nasty cnut" and a "nasty fvcker" in your desperation for a "pwn", as that infantile prat so loves to call it.


                          Originally posted by serrollt View Post
                          Getting all hot under the collar, are we now?

                          first you state -like a petulant teen- that you don't need to back anything up that you claim, now you're demanding the exact opposite from me, even for an obviously overstated snide remark.

                          Just like my necrophiliac joke, my parodying of your determination to force me into a burden of proof about my words on a daft forum is clearly over your head.


                          Originally posted by serrollt View Post
                          I haven't set out your imaginary rules. Obviously there is a difference between being wrong and being a liar, there's also a difference between claims, which may or may not require proof when questioned. Yes, denigrating someone's character by referring to the written word of a third person is an occasion where proof should and can easily be provided.
                          That's your oddball rule, not mine, you prat.

                          Originally posted by serrollt View Post
                          Are you denying that you have had a succession of nics on TD, have you lost count? Most banned, jailed or miserabled?
                          So now it's a "succession", not "dozens"? Is that an attempt to twist your "denigration of my character" which is wrong and lacks proof back onto me?
                          Last edited by Arthur Daley; 10-13-2020, 07:42 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            The obsessive anger on show is astounding.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by serrollt View Post
                              And you had to be ushered off the forum for being an utter fokwit and adolescent prick. Then came back and couldn't even separate your socks and got done for multinicking - what a dumbo!
                              Nope. I was part of the post DD purge. 10-20 active members were jailed on dubious charges. Then I deleted my pictures which triggers an auto ban which I wasn't even aware of

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Sparky View Post
                                The obsessive anger on show is astounding.
                                Indeed.

                                Also astounding how quickly he seeks other targets when rAnt isn't around.

                                Dont get sick of me just yet, for I will be here for quite a while

                                Comment

                                antalya escort
                                antalya escort
                                hdredtube sxe video rettube video sex abg xxxs
                                antalya escort bayan
                                Working...
                                X