Having read through Latin Dancer's lengthy 'marriage implosion' thread on TD http://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...-imploded.html and the usual wanker suspects lining up to give him a kick, one thing struck me.
Of the guys I know that are or have been married to Thais, money was often an issue of contention. In LD's case, he mentioned that for 2.5 years he ferried his wife from her evening job at 9:30pm to save her using public transport, and in that time she only once offered some fuel money. He felt resentful about this after their split, presumably not because of the money, but because as well as doing the right thing by her in picking her up, he paid for her transport to a job for which it sounds like she kept all the salary to herself and expected him to pay most if not all of the domestic bills.
Who is in the wrong, and is this a Thai thing or a woman thing?
Of the guys I know that are or have been married to Thais, money was often an issue of contention. In LD's case, he mentioned that for 2.5 years he ferried his wife from her evening job at 9:30pm to save her using public transport, and in that time she only once offered some fuel money. He felt resentful about this after their split, presumably not because of the money, but because as well as doing the right thing by her in picking her up, he paid for her transport to a job for which it sounds like she kept all the salary to herself and expected him to pay most if not all of the domestic bills.
Who is in the wrong, and is this a Thai thing or a woman thing?
Comment