Originally posted by Ergenburgensmurgen
View Post
I think it’s trying to deflect from some facts

Drip #2
Arthur Daley/Smeg retirement
It enjoys reminding everyone, the same tired claims,………….
Originally posted by Arthur Daley
View Post
………………
Originally posted by Arthur Daley
View Post
……………..
Originally posted by Arthur Daley
View Post
……………..
Originally posted by Arthur Daley
View Post
……………..
Originally posted by Arthur Daley
View Post
The real reason the unemployable loser Arthur Daley/Smeg was forced to take an early retirement. The job interview was only conducted a short time ago and it would be working today if it wasn’t for one particular fact.

The Facts
54. On 12 June 2019 the Respondent sent the Claimant a formal offer of employment. The offer letter stated that "this offer will be subject to the receipt of satisfactory references
67….. Xxxxxxx was only with this team for a short while, he didn’t finish his probation period and it would have been unlikely that he would have successfully completed this probation.... Xxxxxxx was not in post long enough for me to be able to give a full assessment of suitability, there were a number of areas of weakness"
68……….. “In light of the emails received so far, I am not prepared to proceed with the appointment and would like to withdraw the offer………Referee 2 and Referee 1 employed Xxxxxxx prior to this and we have one refusal and the other is not favourable.
69. Ms Xxxx replied at 15.14 the same day saying, “I would consider these unsatisfactory references.”
85. Ms Xxxxx was cross examined about making assumptions and bias. She said that “the alternative to making assumptions is gathering facts”. She said, “I look for references which confirm what the candidate has said in their application and interview. If a reference does not confirm the strengths and qualities of candidate then it is not satisfactory. I have never had an instance like this before where I have not had at least one strong reference for an individual.”
89. Ms Xxxxxxx-Xxx emailed the Claimant on 24 June 2019 saying that: "l regret to inform you that due to receipt of unsatisfactory references, we will not be proceeding with the appointment, and are withdrawing our offer of employment'.
It doesn’t have any “strong references”. Without a doubt, it is an unemployable loser with no long-term work history.



Comment