Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Retirement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ergenburgensmurgen
    replied
    Countdown to Drunky The Bitch Clown getting all belligerent...3...2...
    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post
    Ergenbergen

    Your name Ergenbuggery: Is it Germanic or Germanic-Polynesian in nature?

    You pathetic racist son-of-of-a-bitch!
    ...!! Drunky Bitch Blast-off!!


    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Tinkles
    replied
    Ergenbergen

    Your name Ergenbuggery: Is it Germanic or Germanic-Polynesian in nature?

    You pathetic racist son-of-of-a-bitch!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ergenburgensmurgen
    replied
    Tell me that you're stupid enough to believe Smeg's lies without saying that you're stupid enough to believe Smeg's lies...

    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post

    Ya know Ergiebergie, you've hit the nail on the head....if talking about youself!

    Are you bipolar?

    Honestly it's as though these things fly right over your head

    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Tinkles
    replied
    Originally posted by Ergenburgensmurgen View Post

    Imagine if it had put as much effort into its work as it does its lies and delusions...

    It might've passed probation and be retired by now.
    Ya know Ergiebergie, you've hit the nail on the head....if talking about youself!

    Are you bipolar?

    Honestly it's as though these things fly right over your head

    Leave a comment:


  • Ergenburgensmurgen
    replied
    Question is whose benefit is it actually lying and issuing it's hollow threats for?

    Bitch Tinkles is dumb enough to believe anything it says, Smegbie and the Nazi Oompa Loompa--whilst obviously no geniuses themselves either--are both bitter and desperate enough to repeat what it says even if they don't believe it, and the objective facts are already there to show any rational person that it's a bald-faced and delusional liar.

    So is it trying to convince itself? Is it that deluded that it thinks it can just lie things away?

    Because meanwhile...

    The Facts

    79………..lt did not support what the Claimant had written on his application form or said in his interview, nor did it confirm his suitability
    ...'retired in my 40s...'
    Imagine if it had put as much effort into its work as it does its lies and delusions...

    It might've passed probation and be retired by now.


    Leave a comment:


  • Arthur Daley
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post
    How's retirement going for you Arthur?
    Life's good. Just cooked up a delicious late lunch. Off soon to the airport to collect the Mrs. It would be great to visit the homeland for a month before it gets cold, but it's too much hassle, so will have to wait until the spring.

    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post
    There's a lot of resentment out there over those who can afford to retire early, as compared to those who made bad choices early in life and now have to stare endlessly at their computer screen hoping 'the old dragon' doesn't come into the room to demand their weekly salary cheque
    If you were trapped in a mesh plant for decades and recently got the middle finger from your native country that crushed your hopes of a state pension, you'd be far more interested in my life than in getting on with your tedious admin chores.

    I'm not sure what he's hoping to achieve via six months of pasting a stalked down non sequitur on a thread about retirement, other than showing that he's deranged, bitter, and obsessed. And you're right, he's a conman. Someone with a real law degree would have spotted the elephant in the room in the wording of what he's obsessing about and realised why it was revoked months ago. But he has a fish-brained flat-earther approach, and only sees what he wants to see.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Ergenburgensmurgen
    replied
    Oh noes Drunky the Belligerent Clown Bitch who thinks Smeg the failed office temp is honest doesn't respect me and think she talks for anyone who matters...
    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post
    How's retirement going for you Arthur?


    The Facts

    17. The Claimant applied for the Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx posts. He named three referees on his application form, Xxxxx Xxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxx (five months employment in 2018, most recent employer), Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx – Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (seven months employment in 2016-17) and Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx (four months employment in 2016).

    20………. told the Tribunal that she considered that the application which she now knows to be the Claimant’s, p XXX – XXX, was strong, ………….. His experience of working with a wide range of funders, and the fact that he had worked abroad, suggested that he could work well with different people.

    51. The Claimant told her that he wished to start as soon as possible and, on the same day,……

    55. On 19 June 2019, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant’s 3 referees, asking for a reference…..

    85. Xx Xxxxx was cross examined………. “I look for references which confirm what the candidate has said in their application and interview. If a reference does not confirm the strengths and qualities of candidate then it is not satisfactory. I have never had an instance like this before where I have not had at least one strong reference for an individual.”

    89. Xx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant on 24 June 2019 saying that: "l regret to inform you that due to receipt of unsatisfactory references, we will not be proceeding with the appointment, and are withdrawing our offer of employment'.
    ...


    Leave a comment:


  • S Landreth
    replied
    Ms Tinkles……………How's retirement going for you Arthur?


    Have you seen any of its travel threads?

    About as pitiful as yours.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Tinkles
    replied
    How's retirement going for you Arthur?

    There's a lot of resentment out there over those who can afford to retire early, as compared to those who made bad choices early in life and now have to stare endlessly at their computer screen hoping 'the old dragon' doesn't come into the room to demand their weekly salary cheque

    Leave a comment:


  • S Landreth
    replied
    Rehashing the employment history of a fat loser

    Slow drip #4

    A sad losers employment history.





    The Facts

    17. The Claimant applied for the Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx posts. He named three referees on his application form, Xxxxx Xxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxx (five months employment in 2018, most recent employer), Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx – Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (seven months employment in 2016-17) and Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx (four months employment in 2016).

    20………. told the Tribunal that she considered that the application which she now knows to be the Claimant’s, p XXX – XXX, was strong, ………….. His experience of working with a wide range of funders, and the fact that he had worked abroad, suggested that he could work well with different people.

    51. The Claimant told her that he wished to start as soon as possible and, on the same day,……

    55. On 19 June 2019, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant’s 3 referees, asking for a reference…..

    85. Xx Xxxxx was cross examined………. “I look for references which confirm what the candidate has said in their application and interview. If a reference does not confirm the strengths and qualities of candidate then it is not satisfactory. I have never had an instance like this before where I have not had at least one strong reference for an individual.”

    89. Xx Xxxxxxx-Xxxx emailed the Claimant on 24 June 2019 saying that: "l regret to inform you that due to receipt of unsatisfactory references, we will not be proceeding with the appointment, and are withdrawing our offer of employment'.
    Little math.

    2016 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 4 of those months
    2016/17 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 7 months
    2018 – 12 months. The unemployable loser worked 5 months
    2019 – 6 months looking for work but not working

    So,…………out of 42 months the unemployable loser worked 16 months in 3 different jobs. (38% of the time working during 3.5 years)

    The loser has no long-term employment history. It is an embarrassment to society which it does not contribute to.

    Why?

    Originally posted by Arthur Daley View Post
    Never wanted that drab existence, and never needed it....


    3 different jobs in 3.5 years working only 16 months and it “never wanted that drab existence”.

    The unemployable loser couldn’t find a steady job

    Originally posted by Ergenburgensmurgen View Post

    It's raaaaaaaaaaaaaging and lying again, isn't it.


    Friday afternoon entertainment
    Last edited by S Landreth; 10-01-2021, 02:07 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ergenburgensmurgen
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post
    Wrong Ergiebergie, I'm saying nobody respects you because you are a sad pathetic liar

    Everything you accuse others of is a reflection of yourself.

    You are nothing more than a con-man
    Oh noes Drunky the Belligerent Clown Bitch who thinks Smeg the failed office temp is honest doesn't respect me and think she talks for anyone who matters...























    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Ergenburgensmurgen
    replied
    I don’t really think it can be overstated just how batshit crazy it is that Smeg the fantasist is an office temp working a series of low paid jobs, got declined for one because of this shitty references, sued for racial discrimination and cooked up a fantasy story about winning the case to post on a Thai forum...

    It’s just everything that is bizarre and comical about the absurd little delusional narcissist.

    *And triggered his narcissistic rage and abuse against his referees.
    It's raaaaaaaaaaaaaging and lying again, isn't it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Tinkles
    replied
    Wrong Ergiebergie, I'm saying nobody respects you because you are a sad pathetic liar

    Everything you accuse others of is a reflection of yourself.

    You are nothing more than a con-man

    Leave a comment:


  • Arthur Daley
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post

    I could respect rAnt if he posted this in a self depricating manner

    Clearly he did not. He was always trying to 'BIG' himself up in front of his loser Thaiophiles on teakdoor
    He got caught out because he'd forgotten all about his bs boast three weeks later, then typically attacked me as being in the wrong for remembering it. Nothing's ever Tiny's fault

    Thirteen years later and he's still seeking vengeance via his six months of creepy stalking, pasting, taunting, obsessing, and breaking a forum rule he actually asked to be introduced.

    It's epic endless uncontrollable raaaaaage!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ergenburgensmurgen
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr Tinkles View Post

    I could respect rAnt if he posted this in a self depricating manner

    Clearly he did not. He was always trying to 'BIG' himself up in front of his loser Thaiophiles on teakdoor
    Oh noes Drunky the Belligerent Clown Bitch who thinks Smeg the failed office temp is honest doesn't respect me...























    ...

    Leave a comment:

Valentina Jewels gets pounded like a btich dog ?????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ???? diferentes tipos de bajinas
antalya escort bayan
Working...
X