Retirement

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

Not only did this show how weak forum admin is....they should have told the ugly little runt to f*ck off....it also exposed how tiny his cock is

You losers just can't stop thinking about me can you.

And just like your master, no I won't have sex with you. I'm not gay and could do better for myself than you if I were.

[S Landreth]

Ms Tinkles ………. his cock

Proof the TC’s lonely lying angry rejected fat pink panty wearing irresponsible fruit pickin' I support a loser day drunk Ms. Tinkles is a closet homosexual

Closeted individuals frequently cannot acknowledge to themselves, let alone to others, their homoerotic feelings, attractions and fantasies. Their homosexuality is so unacceptable that it must be kept out of conscious awareness and cannot be integrated into their public persona. Consequently, these feelings must be dissociated from the self and hidden from others.: https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/vie...and-coming-out

[Mr Tinkles]

The member concerned should commission his lawyers to threaten admin and get international arrest warrants for the posters involved.

Not only did this show how weak forum admin is....they should have told the ugly little runt to f*ck off....it also exposed how tiny his cock is

[S Landreth]

I like this drip. another review........

Slow Drip #2

Arthur Daley/Smeg retirement

It enjoys reminding everyone, the same tired claims,………….

right minded are able to retire in their 40s

………………

I'm early retired. Have been for nearly 2 years.

……………..

deeply envious of those retiring in their 40s

……………..

Feel sorry for those that trot off to work day after day, decade after decade because they have to.

……………..

Never wanted that drab existence, and never needed it....

The real reason the unemployable loser Arthur Daley/Smeg was forced to take an early retirement. The job interview was only conducted a short time ago and it would be working today if it wasn’t for one particular fact.

The Facts

54. On 12 June 2019 the Respondent sent the Claimant a formal offer of employment. The offer letter stated that "this offer will be subject to the receipt of satisfactory references

67….. Xxxxxxx was only with this team for a short while, he didn’t finish his probation period and it would have been unlikely that he would have successfully completed this probation.... Xxxxxxx was not in post long enough for me to be able to give a full assessment of suitability, there were a number of areas of weakness"

68……….. “In light of the emails received so far, I am not prepared to proceed with the appointment and would like to withdraw the offer………Referee 2 and Referee 1 employed Xxxxxxx prior to this and we have one refusal and the other is not favourable.

69. Ms Xxxx replied at 15.14 the same day saying, “I would consider these unsatisfactory references.”

85. Ms Xxxxx was cross examined about making assumptions and bias. She said that “the alternative to making assumptions is gathering facts”. She said, “I look for references which confirm what the candidate has said in their application and interview. If a reference does not confirm the strengths and qualities of candidate then it is not satisfactory. I have never had an instance like this before where I have not had at least one strong reference for an individual.”

89. Ms Xxxxxxx-Xxx emailed the Claimant on 24 June 2019 saying that: "l regret to inform you that due to receipt of unsatisfactory references, we will not be proceeding with the appointment, and are withdrawing our offer of employment'.

It doesn’t have any “strong references”. Without a doubt, it is an unemployable loser with no long-term work history.

[S Landreth]

You'd think that it would be better served spending its time working on its CV but no that narcissistic rage just won't quit.

No one will hire the fat liar.

It its case it might be better if smeg/Arthur Daley/nitcha did continue to be a burden on society and a Thai forum laughing stock.

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

Seems this place isn't accepting new members. The verify email doesn't send.

You're here, the beta cuck quotient is full.

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

smeg/Arthur Daley/nitcha is a liar and The Facts support it

Yup... That's why it's desperate for the morons on here to support it.

[S Landreth]

smeg/Arthur Daley/nitcha is a liar and The Facts support it

The Facts

79………..lt did not support what the Claimant had written on his application form or said in his interview, nor did it confirm his suitability

[Arthur Daley]

Yes I was multi-forum bitching & keyboard warrioring soon after 7am as usual. It's the best way to channel my post iron pump aggression, and far preferable to throwing office equipment at the annoying Thai drones I'm surrounded by for decades.

You'd think that this time would be better served starting my tedious rut factory admin, or my PaknSave CV so I can repatriate and get a NZ state pension, but no my narcissistic rage just won't quit.

Another groundhog week of unhinged oneupmanship-seeking stalking & obsessing followed by blatant projection of it is in full flow

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

started early this morning raging

You'd think that it would be better served spending its time working on its CV but no that narcissistic rage just won't quit.

[S Landreth]

...it has been hypervigilantly monitoring and just screamed something for the umpteenth time again, hasn't it.

started early this morning raging

[S Landreth]

smeg/Arthur Daley/nitcha is a liar and The Facts support it

The Facts

79………..lt did not support what the Claimant had written on his application form or said in his interview, nor did it confirm his suitability

[Arthur Daley]

There you go Tinkles. Occasionally post about him and he's "on your brain", whereas if you obsessively stalk and post about me several dozen times per week when you're supposed to be working and parenting he'd think you're completely right-minded

Could it be because he is thick?

That’s a rhetorical question, no need to reply in the positive.

Due to self-esteem and schizo paranoia issues the intelligence possessed gets channeled deviously and aggressively, resulting in a lack of empathy, common sense, and self-control.

It's a pitiful way to exist, but that's the unpleasant wiring he's stuck with.

[Ergenburgensmurgen]

Ergenbergen, you had better rush back to NZ & apply for that Pak'NSave trolley collector job otherwise you'll be stuck in that hellhole forever!

retirement.PNG

Now I know you're a bit thick & not very good with figures but it means if you were born between 1973 and 1975 then you need to have lived in NZ for 18 years (after the age of 20) before you are eligible for a NZ pension

Plenty of toilet cleaner postions available I'm sure should you get rejected from Pak'NSave. Get to it boy!

Here's where I'm stuck...





You should be more worried about yourself. Being a kiwifruit picker and moron that believes Smeg's lies doesn't pay well.

[S Landreth]

Rehashing another drip

Slow Drip #2

Arthur Daley/Smeg retirement

It enjoys reminding everyone, the same tired claims,………….

right minded are able to retire in their 40s

………………

I'm early retired. Have been for nearly 2 years.

……………..

deeply envious of those retiring in their 40s

……………..

Feel sorry for those that trot off to work day after day, decade after decade because they have to.

……………..

Never wanted that drab existence, and never needed it....

The real reason the unemployable loser Arthur Daley/Smeg was forced to take an early retirement. The job interview was only conducted a short time ago and it would be working today if it wasn’t for one particular fact.

The Facts

54. On 12 June 2019 the Respondent sent the Claimant a formal offer of employment. The offer letter stated that "this offer will be subject to the receipt of satisfactory references

67….. Xxxxxxx was only with this team for a short while, he didn’t finish his probation period and it would have been unlikely that he would have successfully completed this probation.... Xxxxxxx was not in post long enough for me to be able to give a full assessment of suitability, there were a number of areas of weakness"

68……….. “In light of the emails received so far, I am not prepared to proceed with the appointment and would like to withdraw the offer………Referee 2 and Referee 1 employed Xxxxxxx prior to this and we have one refusal and the other is not favourable.

69. Ms Xxxx replied at 15.14 the same day saying, “I would consider these unsatisfactory references.”

85. Ms Xxxxx was cross examined about making assumptions and bias. She said that “the alternative to making assumptions is gathering facts”. She said, “I look for references which confirm what the candidate has said in their application and interview. If a reference does not confirm the strengths and qualities of candidate then it is not satisfactory. I have never had an instance like this before where I have not had at least one strong reference for an individual.”

89. Ms Xxxxxxx-Xxx emailed the Claimant on 24 June 2019 saying that: "l regret to inform you that due to receipt of unsatisfactory references, we will not be proceeding with the appointment, and are withdrawing our offer of employment'.

It doesn’t have any “strong references”. Without a doubt, it is an unemployable loser with no long-term work history.